CC-Transcript

• 00:00This is the Asia trade. I’m Paul Allen in Sydney where markets have just opened. Marty Stroud, what’s the top stories this hour? Asian stocks are set to extend Wall Street losses as trade, war and inflation worries come roaring back. President Trump announcing 25% tariffs on all cars imported in the US beginning next week. The president also hinting he may lower tariffs on China to secure support for a US sale of tick tock. We will be getting reaction live from the platform in China where a BBC adviser tells us exclusively that Beijing is ready to step up stimulus if growth loses momentum. Cloud trade tariffs top of mind yet again for this Thursday session. As we open up in Asia, we are looking like Asian stocks will be resuming that sell off after a couple of days of moderate optimism that perhaps we would see sort of some exemptions or some sort of narrower scope when it comes to these tariffs. But that sell off expected to kick off again with uncertainty over the trade policy. We’re seeing equity downside indicated for Australia as we get online. The Japan and Hong Kong also pointing to earlier losses, dollar yen now past that 150 level, which is sort of one thing that we’re sort of monitoring from the DOJ and from regulators there in terms of how much we see a move in the yen that has just been creeping towards that threshold really being refreshed as we heard kind of the BOJ is weighed, also sounding quite dovish in his testimony yesterday. Paul, let’s take a look at how US futures are tracking, seeing a little bit of weakness there. And we saw US stocks sinking again on tariff uncertainty. So S & P futures up by a third of 1% that crude prices ticking up a little, even though we’ve got crude inventories falling by the most since late December. But take a look at these automakers after hours, Ford, GM, Stellantis all falling following that announcements, although we’re seeing a little bit of positivity for Rivian and Tesla there. We were kept waiting for it, but President Trump did eventually give us the news on those auto tariffs. Here he is speaking at the Oval Office. What we’re going to be doing is a 25% tariff on all cars that are not made in the United States. If they’re made in the United States, is absolutely not. We start off with a two and a half percent base, which is what we were at, and we go to 25%. Let’s bring in our White House correspondent Kelly Gardner, who joins us in Washington. Also achieved North Asia correspondent Stephen Engle, who’s on the ground at the farm in China in Hainan, as well as our Bloomberg Markets live strategist Mark Cranfield, joining us out of Singapore. Let me start off with you in terms of exactly what we heard from President Trump and, you know, the contours of what we’re now expecting in terms of these latest tariff announcements. Yeah, well, the president signed today a proclamation imposing a 25% on automobiles, as well as parts that are not made in the U.S.. There are some exemptions for Canada and Mexico prices, but they’re saying that they expect us to bring in about $100 million and new revenue to the U.S.. They’re expected to go into place, into effect, I should say, on April 2nd, and they will start collecting that revenue on April 3rd. But this is really part of a very aggressive campaign by the president and the White House to really tear off other countries. And the president says that he believes other foreign nations have been treating the U.S. unfairly. And so he’s going to continue with these sorts of tariffs. He also talked about today pharmaceuticals. And so that’s certainly an area that we’re going to be watching to come up next. We also heard from President Trump talking about whether there might be a carve out for China when it comes to the potential sale of TikTok in the US. Let’s have a listen to what he had to say. I’m worried about our country more than anything else with respect to tick tock and that China is going to have to play a role in that, possibly in the form of an approval maybe. And I think they’ll do that. Maybe I’ll give them a little reduction in tariffs or something to get it done. With a deadline looming for the tick Tock sale. Kayla, do we have any idea of what potential reduction could be in store for China? Well, the president was actually asked about that by our colleague, who is actually sitting in the booth with me right now. But she was asking whether that the U.S. is confident that they’ll be able to meet this deadline next month for the sale of tick tock. And Vice President Judy Vance is the person that really leading those negotiations on behalf of the White House, talking with various companies about a potential avenue to sort of buy the app or potentially do a U.S. spin off of the app. And the president floated a reduction possibly in tariffs. He said, quote, That sounds like something that I would do, but he did not give any specifics, but certainly teasing they’re trying at the Chinese officials where this possible deal. Or have White House correspondent Kayla Gardner there. Let’s get to the Boao Forum now, where tariffs have obviously been a hot button topic. Stephen Engle joins us there with more Steve. Yeah, obviously tariffs are on everybody’s lips. I will actually be moderating a panel later this morning on the global economy. Pretty broad subject, right? But I’ll guarantee you, tariffs are going to be a large part of that. Included on the panel will be the former deputy managing director of the IMF and former Deputy PBOC Governor Zhu Min, among others. And we will be delving into the impact, obviously, of these tariffs. We’re going to be talking to Stephen Roach as well coming up in the next half hour. The former, of course, Asia-Pacific chairman of Morgan Stanley. He’s been outspoken here at Boao, saying some of these panels are pretty complacent about the risks to globalization and the risks that the tariffs possibly could pose on the US and global economy. So we are going to be delving into that on pretty much the last full day here at Boao, where we are going to get the plenary session speeches, including from the Vice Premier. No top leaders would not Xi Jinping, not Li Chang, but vice premier will be giving the opening while opening is sort of the closing, isn’t it? A plenary speech later today. We also yesterday spoke to a key PBOC adviser, a noted economist, Huang Yiping, who said essentially the Chinese economy is showing signs of strength in the beginning part of this year, which will help them navigate through these tariff chaos. Here is Huang keeping. The government has made it very clear that if there is a need both of the fiscal policy and the monetary policy can step up, that I think is very clear. So basically it will be data driven. If the economy is strong, then perhaps we can just go with it. But if the economy shows signs of a softness, then both the fiscal and monetary policies still have enough The scope for further expansion. How would you assess it right now coming out of the National People’s Congress? There seem to be a lot of talking about green shoots of confidence, but the property market in the first couple of months was still quite weak, consumer demand still quite weak, and they didn’t necessarily announce specifics on easing or further large, large fiscal outlays other than long term bonds and the like. Now, do you see right now the need for further easing? Well, I think that we need the policy to be ready. If we need that, We as I said, it’s a data driven decision. But the one that we saw was after the end of September last year, the policy is a turn around and the numbers pick it up. So the first quarter was a much better than the third quarter. If you look at the high frequency data for the first couple of months, I think we actually had a reasonably good start. Obviously, we needed to prevent a repeat of what happened before. That is the second quarter and the third quarter. We again, and on that, I think that the readiness of the fiscal and monetary policy to support the economy would be very useful. In the first Trump trade war we saw, I don’t want to use the term weaponization of the yuan, but we did see the weakening of the yuan some 11% over two years. This time the PBOC has kept it very steady and stable. Is that sort of weakening the overall easing platform or what? BUFFET that is, that they’re stable, should they weaken it further? Well, there are many different arguments. If you is if you weaken the currency, that might be useful in the short term or for exports. But at the same time, as you know, exchange rate also has a big impact on the capital flows. It has an impact on trade flows, but also on capital flows. I think for the policy makers you have to balance trying to weigh, which is more important if the currency is a weaker and hopefully if it gets lots of exports, then it’s a good. But it’s possible that you might not get a lot of exposure while you weaken the confidence of investors. So I think in my view is that the exchange rate is still managed to float, so management is still part of it and at the end of the day you need to balance the likely impact on different part of the economy. What do you think the policy response so far to the external shocks? Has it been successful enough? We don’t know what’s coming. On April 2nd. There could be further tariffs. Is China going to be able to weather this external shock? Well, China will be able to weather the external shocks. The question is how big a will be the shock. But that’s also in line with the policy direction going forward. Exports are will be important to continuously to be important. The question is can. China continuously rely on exports to drive the Chinese to grow. That’s why the priority actually now is more on expanding domestic demand, particularly domestic consumption. So we are looking to April 2nd here in China to see if added tariffs will happen on China. And again, on that tick tock concession, if you will, that Donald Trump alluded to, that might not necessarily be agreed to by China because so far China has not budge on the sale of the demanded sale by the United States of tick tock to a U.S. investor. Our chief North Asia correspondent is Devin Stephen Engle there at the forum in Hainan. Meanwhile, St Louis Fed President Abbas Mazloum says it’s not clear the impact of these tariffs will prove temporary. He’s warning that secondary effects could prompt officials to hold rates steady for longer. I would be wary of assuming that the impact of tariff increases on inflation, it will be entirely temporary or that a look through strategy will necessarily. The appropriate. I would be especially vigilant about indirect second round effects on inflation. Let’s frame for a market’s view through now. It is difficult at this point. There seems to still be a pretty steady camp in markets that assume that the Fed is going to be able to stay the course. Well, bond traders are already making up their mind on that one by steepening the yield curve. So clearly what is happening here is that the people who invest in particularly long term treasuries have already decided exactly as the Fed speaker was saying, that the risk is off to the upside for inflation, that it will stay in the system for much longer than the Federal Reserve is hoping for. Now, that may well mean that the Federal Reserve, at some point this year is able to lower short term interest rates. We do have two rate cuts priced in in the Fed dot plot that was released last week, but there’s not much the Fed can do about long term yields that’s really in the hands of the market and how they feel the long term inflation aspects will play out. And for now, most traders are thinking that the effect of tariffs over the next several months going into next year will keep the CPI numbers a bit higher than the Fed is comfortable with. The Fed have also said in some of the people speaking recently that they’re willing to look through temporary changes in inflation where the market is beginning to decide, as you just heard there, that this is not a temporary situation, that the the trade war is going to be there for some time. It’s not just about what the US is doing. It’s also going to be the responses from other countries as well. We’ve already heard today from Canada’s prime minister that he’s not happy about these auto tariffs. I mean, we’re expecting to hear from the Europeans later today. It’s the middle of the night now, but when they do, they’re also going to be on that side. So it’s it’s a two way street. And that means that globally inflation is likely to stay higher for everybody and it will be reflected in steeper yield curves. The Treasury has got a long way to go yet. The curve is only modestly steep on this. It could do a lot more. It’s also going to affect what happens in European bond yields and even those in Asia as well. So what we see in the Treasury market is one of the clear indications that investors expect this trade war to go on for quite some time. Yeah, and another shot fired today, Mark, in terms of that announcement from President Trump, 25% tariffs on all autos not made in the US. We’ve already seen a Ford Stellantis GM falling after hours. It might not be a terrific day for Asia’s car makers. And also the Canadian dollar. We’re already seen the Canadian dollar weakened in early trading here as well. So it spreads across markets. There’s not just an equity market story, but as you say, we would expect to see some volatility in the big automakers here in Asia and probably when European markets open later in the day. That’s obviously some of the biggest companies like BMW, for example, Mercedes, they export a lot of cars into the United States and most of those are not made onshore. So you would expect to see quite a lot of action there as well. But it also affects currencies. The euro is slightly weaker already, so it’s across the board. Really, the whole thing is very unnerving for investors. And there’s an old saying in foreign exchange markets that confusion breeds contempt. Well, currently investors are very confused about what is going to happen now, what’s going to happen next week, how things are going to play out. And when they do that, that means they become defensive. They become negative. They’re being negative on equities. There’s certain currencies. They don’t like euro and the Canadian dollar taking the brunt of it for the time being. And they don’t like what’s happening in the yield curve in bonds as well. There’s a number of ways this this can play out, but clearly when investors are not feeling confident, they’re going to be looking for ways to reduce risk. And this is how it is going to play out for some time here. The US exceptionalism is wearing out is probably going to get worse before it gets better. And that means that Bloomberg is running a big story today about M & A. Action is not playing out as people expect. He’s since Trump became president and you can expect to see more of this kind of thing. US markets are priced very expensively. When President Trump came in and they’re now beginning to unwind that and it could be quite a bit further to go. All right. Bloomberg’s Mark Cranfield bit still to come on the Asia trade. We will be back live at the Boao Forum with Yale professor and former Morgan Stanley Asia chairman Stephen Roach. Plus, we’re going to talk market strategies with UBS and BlackRock. Much more ahead. This is Bloomberg. U.S. President Donald Trump and top allies are struggling to defend criticism over the inclusion of a journalist in that signal chat discussing war plans in Yemen. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claim that no classified information was shared in that chat. I notice this morning out came something that doesn’t look like war plans. And as a matter of fact, they even changed the title to attack plans because they know it’s not war plans. There’s no units, no locations, no routes, no flight paths, no sources, no methods, no classified information. But as the president national security adviser stated, no classified information was shared. There were no sources, methods, locations or war plans that were shared. This was a standard update to the national security cabinet that was provided alongside updates that were given to foreign partners in the region. Families framed Lindbergh’s microchip. And at the same time, we’re hearing the White House also going so far as to say that this sort of concern is part of a coordinated effort by Democrats to sow chaos. But it’s pretty hard for critics to be able to take the explanation that’s been given. Well, that’s right, Heidi. And what we’re seeing is that flooding the zone with defiance as they have been able to successfully do during the preceding weeks of the administration, when faced with criticism, is not working out quite so well this time. And the argument that there was no classified information shared during these exchanges that involved a reporter from The Atlantic, the editor in chief, Jeff Goldberg, really was not holding water for many in Washington, including the Republican head of the Senate Armed Services Committee, who had looked at the text and concluded that, yes, indeed, some classified material had indeed been exchanged on the platform and been exposed to somebody on the outside of this circle of national security trust. And to add to that point, the Atlantic itself published a full trans, nearly full transcript of the conversation among the officials to highlight the hole in the administration’s argument that no classified material had been shared. And Michael, you note the tone of defiance there. I guess that makes it unlikely that any heads are going to roll. Well, for now, it doesn’t seem like anybody is in jeopardy of losing their jobs, despite what is truly a significant intelligence blunder, according to many experts out there who have decades of experience in the national security field and even members of the president’s own party. Yes. Yesterday from Republican Senator Kevin Cramer, who was aghast that the whole idea and really questioned about the discipline and wondered whether there should be more severe consequences. But for now, the response has been confined to lashing out at the media, questioning whether there was anything classified in nature being shared and doing an internal probe run by someone inside the White House rather than have a special counsel, as might be typically called for, to do an investigation or have the FBI conduct an inquiry itself. But as the pressure grows, some of that course may ultimately have to change because, as I said, the story is not really going away. And we’re seeing the president and his advisers continuing to have to answer for it. Mark Carney has said that it is really shows that the five Eyes need to look out for themselves. Right. You’ve got to wonder what traditional allies is. I mean, we know how sort of Europe is traded in this chat, but but also adversaries might be thinking about this. Well, and that’s a great question, Heidi, because we’ve already seen this rupture in trust between the U.S. and its long standing allies in Europe over the war in Ukraine and how they have seen the Trump administration take this remarkable pivot toward Vladimir Putin adopting some of Russia’s talking points with respect to how the war started and that it just adds to all the concerns that we’re seeing are related to this breach and exposure of sensitive information. And it will make those allies think twice about sharing what they know and what they might need to share with the U.S. in amongst themselves. All right. Bloomberg’s and Michael Shepard there in Washington. Let’s get some more news out of Washington now. US Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren says President Trump could fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell as part of a purge that she thinks may disrupt US markets. Warren had opposed Powell reappointment during President Biden’s term due to his support for reducing financial regulations. But she told us exclusively she stands behind the independence of the Fed and other government agencies. So he can just mow through the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. It’s a form of lawlessness and all the power belongs to the king that it suggests nobody is safe, not even the chairman of the Federal Reserve. President Trump has reiterated the desire for the US to annex Greenland. As Vice President J.D. Vance heads to the island. Trump says Washington needs Greenland for international safety and security and that it’s essential for defensive and offensive postures. Francis visit to Greenland, which was initially billed as a family outing, has been scaled down amid local backlash. The Trump administration has cut $20 million in funding for the agency responsible for CHIP export controls. The Bureau of Industry and Security oversees trade and US technology. The 10% budget cut has drawn sharp criticism on Capitol Hill. Democratic senators say it threatens US efforts to stay ahead of China in the AI race and compromises national security. More ahead on the Asia trade. This is Bloomberg. Welcome back. Some of the top stories that we’re watching in the air space, A.D. Co and analysts say Microsoft has canceled new center projects in the U.S. and Europe due to an oversupply of computers that power. They say the move reflects Microsoft’s earlier decision to pass up on some new business from open air. In a statement, Microsoft says it remains well positioned to meet increasing customer demand. Bloomberg’s been told that open air expects to more than triple is revenue this year at almost $13 billion. A source says that’s fueled by the strength of its paid software. Corporate versions of chat to have over 1 million users. It recently added a $200 a month subscription option. Take a look at how is setting up, particularly in the space as we see that big move when it comes to the yen continuing to come under pressure, particularly with that dovish us in the comments we heard from governor way to the dollar also rising amidst the backdrop of auto tariffs. If you look at the high frequency data for the first couple of months, I think that we actually had a reasonably good start. Obviously, we needed to prevent a repeat of what happened before. That is the second quarter and the third quarter we again. And on that, I think the readiness of the the fiscal and monetary policy to support the economy would be very useful. That’s PBOC adviser Huang Yaping speaking exclusively to Bloomberg at the Boao Forum. And let’s get back to the forum now with Stephen Engle standing by with our next guest. Steve if that’s right. Stephen roach. He is the Yale law school senior fellow and the former Morgan Stanley Asia chairman. Thanks as always, Steven. Great to see you. Great. So you’ve been in China now a week. You were at the China Development Forum. You’re now at Boao. What do you make of what the Chinese leadership is saying in the face, obviously, of a slowing domestic economy? Well, they’ve stabilized the domestic economy, according to some estimates, including Wang Yi being there and also, of course, those external shocks. What do you make of it right now? They want us all to believe that they’re fine, that they’re prepared for another round of external shocks, and they’re very focused on internal demand as the offset the keywords, the top hits coming out of the NPC and going into the China Development Forum, and both are household consumption. That’s music to my ears. I have been preaching the gospel on consumer led rebalancing in China for I checked my files a couple of days ago, 17 years in a row, and my Chinese friends said to me years ago, Keep going, don’t let go. You know, one of these days they might get the message and this year they’ve gotten the message. But what I’m worried about, Steve, is that their program is more slogans than substantive actions that really give me confidence that the consumer revival is at hand. Yeah, it’s always in the implementation and the devil’s in the details and it’s really hard to wean yourself off that great cocktail of investment led growth. And when we heard in Hong Kong a few months ago from Pangong Chang, the BBC governor, he basically prioritized both still investment led growth and consumption. Do you think it won’t be enough? Well, the trick on consumption, in my view, is you can generate a lot of jobs through rebalancing into labour intensive sectors like services. You can raise real wages by moving poor people from rural to urban residences, and that generates growth, good growth and labour income. It needs to be faster, but you know, you can do it, but then you have to convert that income into spending. And Chinese households want to save it because they’re fearful of an uncertain future. 60% of their household wealth is tied to property. And we know what’s happened to property. Right. And well, it’s it’s not just that they’ve lost money and property, it’s that their social safety net for health care and for retirement as they get older. And China’s aging faster than any major economy in the world today is inadequate. And so they are fearful of how they can make ends meet when they’re older. And how do you convert that fear into confidence? That’s a big stumbling block. Do you feel a charm offensive, though, from Xi Jinping and the other leadership here through the CDF, through Bo Wall and the like, and the meetings with the tech, the rehabilitation of Jack Ma, the meeting potentially tomorrow with foreign executives in Beijing, I assume with Xi Jinping there is definitely a charm offensive going on. And we’ve seen this before and, you know, they can be charming when they want to and, you know, sort of not quite as charming when they want to as well. We’ll see how the, you know, the charm holds up on what we finally are calling at least what our president in the United States is calling a liberation day next week when tariffs go up around the world and there is retaliation that follows. And the risk of a global trade war increases, the charm could begin to wear off rather quickly in that event. Well, you also compared Liberation Day to Ground Zero on globalisation. Is that what’s happened? You really blasted yesterday in your panel this complacency about the threat to globalization. Yeah, I was part of a typical panel that stressed the glorious outcomes of win win globalization, and I reminded them that globalization is, you know, is not like it’s carved in the Ten Commandments. We had a powerful wave of globalization that began around 1880 and ended with the imposition of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Acts in 1930. That led to a 60% plus contraction in global trade that contributed mightily to the Great Depression. And, you know, here we are. You know, 90 years later. And we’re at risk of making a similar mistake with multilateral tariffs on all of our trading partners who we run deficits with are over 100 of them right now. And what the Trump administration doesn’t understand, among many things, is that there will be retaliation when trades go on. Tariffs go up on the nations we run deficits with. So, yeah, the Smoot-Hawley Act in 1930 came about eight months after the bank crash, the Wall Street crash in October 29, and it lasted until 1939, the Great Depression. I’ve talked to a number of people here who said the US potentially is heading in a similar trajectory towards recession. What do you think? Well, I think, you know, it’s I’m not going to sit here and say that we’re going to go into a depression, but I think that the risk to the US economy are tilting quickly to the downside for the simple reason is that Trump’s policy uncertainty that he is injecting and he’s doing it again overnight right now with autos and who knows what comes next has taken our gauges of uncertainty to a record high. Uncertainty is the enemy of decision making. So businesses, when faced with uncertainty, will not make the big fixed cost decisions to hire new workers and to expand plants and to engage in construction of new facilities to expand our productive capacity. So that uncertainty is really hitting the most dynamic segments of the US economy right between the eyes. And, you know, that certainly raises the probabilities of recession later this year or into 2026 in the US with collateral damage all around, you know, the interconnected still barely globalized world, Well, that’s being reflected in the stock market of late as well. I think the Nasdaq was down another 2%. So the engine of the growth of the American economy has been reflected as a proxy in the market by the Max seven. And what do you think your what is your outlook for US stocks throughout the rest of this year if this continues? Well, I’ve learned as an economist that the last thing you want to do is call the stock market. But I did note and wrote about it that late last year, the so-called Mag seven, which Bloomberg has popularized with its proprietary Mag seven index, which I follow hourly sometimes, and had moved up to a market capitalization that was 34% of the total S & P market cap. I mean, it’s an unbelievable concentration bet on seven companies who are admittedly, you know, in a perfect position to benefit from the revolutionary technologies of AI, but the market has value them well in excess of any revolutionary impact they’re going to have. And so, you know, they corrected sharply and, you know, the deep sea sharp shock effects of what’s going on in this country are not an inconsequential part of that correction. And there’s probably more to come. What do you make of the deep sea is on every official’s lips right now? Deep six and the other little mini dragons in Jiangsu province of AI. It’s really given them a sense of confidence at a time when walls are building up abroad. It’s classic Chinese technology and imitation where they take a great idea that has been put together by others, you know, large language learning. And they’ve certainly played a role in developing and understanding the science as well. But in America, through Open AI and others were first movers. But it’s a, you know, technology in the U.S. it requires an inordinate amount of data processing and energy to run the, you know, large language searching that is required by the Chinese. And, you know, we can do the same thing. The algorithms to do the large language learning are not proprietary. We understand them. We’ve written some of them, but we can do them at a cost point that is so far below the American cost point. And the comparisons are a staggering 5 to 10% of the cost of the US counterpart. So that challenges the whole dominance of American companies from the standpoint of the cost structure they have, the profitability they’ve been able to accrue and the Chinese counterpart is is quite extraordinary by comparison. So a best case scenario, what do you think a Trump China trade deal would look like? Where are the areas that potentially can be agreed upon or there’s concessions made? Do you see that happening or is it more the worst case scenario? Look, Trump is all over the place. You know, he wants to deal with the fentanyl issue. He wants to deal with, quote, unfair trading practices. He sort of rolled out the script that Robert Lighthizer wrote for him in 2018 was a Section three on allegations of, you know, theft of intellectual property for technology transfer, predatory M & A activity. He wants everything and more. It’s hard to know what kind of deal he’s really looking for. He did phase one, you know, as a panacea, and he called it the greatest deal in the history of deals that came after. Of course, the USMCA was also the greatest deal in the history of deals. China agreed to buy an incremental 200 billion of of U.S. exports in 20 2020 and 2021 review that’s coming out April 1st. Well, you know, I look at the studies Chad Bown of the Peterson Institute, who went over to the State Department, you know, did a brilliant studying and assessing how much of Phase one accomplished. And he said, you know, the U.S. fell $200 billion short of hitting the $200 billion target. So it was it wasn’t a great deal. Stephen Roach, always great to see you. Thank you, Steve, to see the next year at Boao, but we’ll see on that one. Look, I want to be here to celebrate your 20th anniversary. And this one. My yes. So that next year will be my 20th anniversary coming to Bow. Thanks so much. Thank you. Aaron Roach, always great to see you. Back to you guys in the bay Party for sure. Our chief North Asia correspondent Stephen Engle there in Boyle for us this 19th year. Steve was talking to Stephen about the significance of deep sea, of course, and all of this exuberance. And on that topic, we’re hearing that Openai is close to finalizing that $40 billion SoftBank led funding round. We’re hearing that the deal is set to value the company at $300 billion, including point break. That’s almost double its previous valuation of 157 billion from last year. Under this deal, SoftBank will invest an initial tranche of seven and a half billion with a second lot or 30 billion later on this year. Investors include the likes of Magnetar Capital Co, two Management Founders Fund and Altimeter Capital Management in talks to participate. We have not had any comment from a number of these parties that are involved in this funding round, but this would be the largest funding round of all time, according to data from PITCHBOOK. With that $300 billion value, including that dollars raised, the topic hasn’t commented either, but we have seen SoftBank committed to a number of separate other air related projects as well. Billions to the Stargate Project. The Abilene, Texas, Texas based joint venture with partners, including the likes of OPENAI, Oracle Corp and MGM X. We had previously reported at the end of January that $40 billion number as well with that up to $300 billion value. But we’re hearing now that they are getting closer to that finalized funding round. Well, coming up next, Shelly Barshefsky is a former U.S. trade official who thinks that China’s trade surplus is too big for the world. That exclusive conversation is next. This is Bloomberg. Well, the former US trade representative and Ambassador Charlene Barshefsky, thinks that China is running a trade surplus that the world cannot live with. She spoke to Bloomberg in an exclusive conversation at the HSBC Global Investment Summit in Hong Kong. Was it a mistake? Absolutely not. When you consider that 500 million people were brought out of poverty in China because of their economic change, when you consider that China became an important import source for the world and indeed the demand driver during the global financial crisis, not a mistake when you consider China’s contributions on the exports sides provided demand signals were appropriately responded to. Not as happening today. China has reverted to a highly statist economy that China is nonresponsive to demand signals, which is to say flooding the market with exports, and that China’s basic development model, which moved from reform and opening to highly statist, is a model wholly dependent at this juncture on investment investment in manufacturing. Not that what the world needs right now. We don’t have a supply problem in the world. We have a demand problem. And in that regard, China’s contribution to demand, which used to be a positive, is now a negative, which is to say a dearth of demand in China because of structural and other issues in China. So China is ex exploiting manufacturing, suppressing domestic consumption and expects that the world can live with $1,000,000,000,000 Chinese trade surplus, which most certainly the world cannot. One of the major pivot points this year has been this focus back among Chinese policy makers on boosting domestic consumption. I can’t think of a better way to solve trade imbalances by getting that entire market buying again. Well, do you think that should be part of the consideration in terms of negotiations that there is this there is this exercise, while long, it might take, for example, to get demand going internally? I think that’s absolutely a political focus and in the minds of some, the critical focus. So China has provided various plans to stimulate consumption. They’re generally vague and they generally have fallen short. It just came out with a new 32 point plan on this. We’ll have to see how that is implemented ultimately and what the actual detail is. I do think there is finally a real realization in China on the part of the leadership that indeed driving consumption does become very important. It’s an important part of the equation. And the imbalance that exists in China’s economy today can’t be rectified until consumption increases. I can’t think of an exporting economy that will do a sufficient enough job apart from China to satisfy trade imbalances. In other words, are we looking for an export market that the world hedonist Latin like? What do we need to be asking China to do? What is its path in solving trade imbalances? More important than China in solving trade imbalances is the United States. So the focus on tariffs in the United States for many reasons is largely misplaced. What the US needs to do is bring down its fiscal deficit. It needs to reorient supply chains, not by itself. It can’t do it by itself, but by in fact engaging with allies, partners, many others, to try and bring manufacturing back to the US and other countries. That’s former US trade representative and Ambassador Charlene Barshefsky there. You can watch us live and you can see our past interviews on our interactive TV function. TV go there. You can also dive into any of the securities or Bloomberg functions we talk about, and you can become part of the conversation by sending us instant messages during our shows. This is Bloomberg. Deal makers across Wall Street are facing a stark reality check after predicting a deal’s boom driven by the Trump presidency. Today’s Bloomberg Big Tech reveals that instead, deal makings is essentially on hold as lenders become more selective about the transactions that they’re backing. Senior equities reporter Bailey Lipschultz joins us now from New York. So, Bailey, tell us, how’s the first quarter shaped up on the deals from? It’s shaping up pretty poorly and it’s tracking below what we had been expecting. Below it, even kind of the more skeptical bankers had been penciling in whether that’s some of the larger M & A that maybe people were expecting would be happening with Donald Trump back in the White House, potentially opening the floodgates or within IPOs where people were bracing for private equity and venture capitalists to finally break the ice and get new companies back into the market, all things considered. It’s very much a more tepid outlook when we talk to bankers, lawyers and advisors across the suite of products and deals. Are we seeing some of that sort of confidence whiplash around tariffs? Is that one of the secondary effects of all this uncertainty? I think that’s the biggest driver. When we talk to advisers, the question is how can you strategize for a deal whether you’re the seller or the buyer, when any given moment, a post or comments from the Oval Office can be force, it forces you to rethink what your value proposition is. Some of these companies will be coming out with kind of guidance before a board meeting on what this what deals could look like, what the price could be. And then before the meeting even happens, the entire kind of thesis around it or the thinking around valuation can do a complete 180 when you’re looking at tariffs that are on again, off again. And as we track throughout the public markets, when stocks are gyrating and the VIX index for good part of the month of March was well above 20, that forces people to rethink what that value proposition would be. And if you’re sitting on a board trying to come up with a thesis on whether you should pull the trigger. The advice from lawyers, bankers and some of these external advisors is that you need long term visibility. And right now that is the last thing people are getting from the White House around policy issues and obviously what’s been pretty mixed economic data. Bloomberg senior equities reporter Bailey Lipschultz in New York. And speaking of that trade related uncertainty, we’ll be watching auto stocks trading in the session in Korea and Japan set to open at the start of that session. Shortly following, of course, president trump’s announcement of these 25% tariffs on autos not made in the US effective next Wednesday. This is the sort of pressure that we’re expecting to see when it comes to some of these automakers. And it’s interesting, we’ll be watching for Hyundai in particular, despite, of course, being lauded for their US investment. It does seem like they would still be subject to this 25% tariff on all cars made in the not made in the U.S., I should say, effective from April 2nd. We have heard that potentially reciprocal duties may be announced next week, but just a great deal of uncertainty there, as you can see in terms of the risk aversion that we’re seeing in the session so far this Thursday morning in Asia. The market opens next. This is Bloomberg. This is the Asia trade war, counting down to Asia’s major market opens, and it looks like we’re going to see that resumption of the sell off in Asia, right Ressentiment really being taken a hit by these auto tariffs of 25% that go into effect next Wednesday, possibility of sort of either reciprocal tariffs or some relief being announced. But again, it is this confusion over tariffs, not to mention, of course, the sort of geopolitical concerns over this ongoing signal chat debacle that that is really preoccupying the news flow. Yeah, that’s not going away either. And that defiant tone from the White House over the signal chat story also just as deeply embedded. But in terms of tariff carve outs when they could be something for China. Here regards the sale of tick tock. So again, waiting and seeing it is this sort of bedrock of uncertainty that investors continue to contend with. Right. In particular when it comes to, you know, how much the primary economic effects of which we haven’t seen yet on inflation really, but also the secondary effects in terms of how corporates and households are kind of dealing with this degree of uncertainty and how that’s going to play out for how much the Fed is going to be able to stay the course on its current trajectory. We are seeing that downside at the moment. As you can see, the Nikkei just coming online with the top picks up by about 7/10 of 1% each. We’re looking for that negative impact, of course, playing out in what should be a pretty straightforward way for a lot of the automakers, particularly the likes of Hyundai. It should be interesting. Of course, they had just a few days ago been complimented by President Trump in terms of the massive investment they’ve made in the US. But it does not seem like perhaps this sort of ongoing effort is necessarily going to get them exempt from these across the board levies on cars that are not made in the United States. But again, at the moment pushing through that 150 Honda, we have seen the dollar rising again as a bit of a haven bid with this tariff announcement. But also that dovish note that we heard from Governor Awada in his testimony to parliament yesterday could be at play there as well. Switching out the board to take a look at the costs. BE and we do know that there are going to be automakers, of course, that are heavily impacted there, I should mention, across both the Japanese and the Korean markets. We should be watching for some of these AI and tech related names as well, given that Bloomberg story saying that we’re close to seeing open air finalizing a $40 billion fundraising round led by SoftBank, so one to watch in the session today, Paul, in terms of how we’re tracking here in Australia, you got the ASX giving a lot, giving up a lot of the gains that we saw on Wednesday off about half of 1% at the moment. Most sectors in the red, although materials and energy not doing too badly. We have also got the Aussie dollar softening just a little. Of course it’s all about budgets, an election here at the moment. We’ll get the budget reply speech from the Opposition tonight as they unveil cost of living plans to take it to the election, the date of which could be announced, Heidi, as soon as tomorrow. Well, Paul, our next guest thinks investors should be prepared for a wide range of tariffs that will increase volatility. Joining us now from Singapore is Coventry Regional CEO at UBS Global Wealth Management. And, you know, we’re having a bit of a chuckle on what we should start the conversation on. And it just has to be tariffs If it feels like it’s going to be tariffs for some time to come. Yeah, I think oh, absolutely. I think the overhang from terrorists will likely be on the markets until the 2nd of April, until we get in detail what and where the terrorists will be implemented. The fear is that there will be a universal tariff on all markets at a determined rate. I think that will likely be the worst case scenario, but I think the chances of that happening appears to be slimmer. After comments recently by the White House where the tariffs are concerned. So if there are basically a tiered rate of tariffs on certain countries and certain sectors that I think the market may actually react a little more positively. But nonetheless of the that there is will likely be an overhang on the markets until we get more details on the nuances where the implementation of the theories are concerned. You talk about capital preservation strategies and obviously we want to know about how you kind of protect against the downside risks. The that’s likely to get tricky and tricky because I think where the narrative is concerned is stagflation. If the narrative is deflation increasingly takes hold under market, then obviously that’s likely to actually be quite negative or asset classes as a result of that. And in that kind of scenario, I think the only thing you can actually do is to actually manage your duration risk, which basically means that you have to reduce your equities and actually move into the very short duration government bonds, developed market government bonds that in a way could actually protect and anchor your portfolio. On top of that, perhaps you can actually move into your private investments as well, like, for example, your private credit or private equity and hold it on a medium to longer term basis, because if these are not mark to market on a daily basis, that intellectually reduces the volatility on your portfolios as well. But that’s not our view. We think that’s where the there is a concern. We think that with the economy slowing down, that the Federal Reserve will continue to actually cut rates twice this year, once in June, and when it’s in September by 25 basis points. And that in turn should actually be enough to actually lift equity markets for the rest of the year. You know, let’s take a look at how equity markets have been performing. I mean, specifically the S & P now heading for its first quarterly loss since September 2023. We’re back below that 200 day moving average. But when you see that, do you think, okay, let’s go shopping. I think for certain sectors, definitely we we are still pretty positive on the AI and tech sector and we think that the earnings growth where these sectors are concerned will likely be able to lift share prices over the next six months. But nonetheless, again, because of the current terror situation, any risk appetite that investors have with regards to exposure to the tech sector will likely be quite neutral at this point in time until we get further announcements for the details on how the tariffs are likely to be. And we’re not going to expect that until the 2nd of April, unfortunately. In terms of the high tech story. Are you at all concerned that things might be getting a little bit frothy there, that there are shades of the dot com bubble and maybe we’re seeing a bubble in some of these related names and around datacentre capacity as well? Not really. We don’t think that there is a bubble in the air in the tech sector, actually, because we think that where the valuations are concerned, they actually pretty well supported by your earnings growth rate. If you look at some of the some of the stocks that despite the massive increase in the share prices, the valuations have actually been pretty flat, which basically means that the earnings growth has actually been keeping up with the increase in the share prices. So we don’t think that there is a bubble there. And of course, if we compare the valuations now with 2000, when during the Nasdaq bubble, the valuations now are actually pretty tame in comparison with very significant growth in earnings. And on top of that, these companies are actually profitable. A lot of them are actually very profitable with very healthy balance sheets as well. Where a data center is concerned. We think that this proliferation of of air demand with regards to the lower cost air models, that Intel is likely to actually lead to a very strong increase in demand for datacentre capacity. So on a short term basis, perhaps that could potentially be a narrative, But on a medium to longer term basis, we do think that demand for data center will definitely increase. Kelvin, within Asia, India is one of your preferences and I wonder the recent surge that we’re seeing, do you think that is coming off the bottom or is it short covering? I think it’s a mixture of both. And I do think that on top of that, there is also a fair bit of rotation from some of the Southeast Asian markets here. You’ve seen the sell off in Indonesia. You’ve seen a weak performance in Thailand and that actually has resulted in some of the investors rotating into India as well. The Indian market since the towards the end of last year until recently, has not done well. And I think do think that we’re earnings growth, revision downwards is going to be more or less at the bottom with rate cuts coming through from the from the Reserve Bank of India as well. We do think that now India is actually starting to look a little bit more attractive, largely because the valuations have actually come off quite sharply as well. So India is actually quite an interesting market to look at from this point of view. Taiwan is another one. Is that again, the sort of tech play there? Yeah, it is. If you like the AI and tech story, you definitely need to like Taiwan. But again, unfortunately it has actually been caught up in the recent sell off with regards to the tech names as a result of the introduction of Deep Sea in January and of course with the recent announcements on tariffs as well. So we do think that on a short to medium term basis, perhaps there might be some weakness there. But any weakness in our view is actually a good opportunity for us to actually accumulate some positions there because on a medium to long term basis, again, the tech and the UI names actually look really attractive in our view. Kelvin, before we let you go, you also favour gold. How much more upside do you see from here? Absolutely. The the the fact that gold prices are near its record highs is largely because of three factors. One, uncertainty. And we’re getting a massive amount of that recently to the dollar weakening in the last couple of weeks. And we do think that this is a trend that’s likely to continue because your European use of actually shot up as a result of the massive selloff in German born use in German bonds recently as well. So that will likely support for the weakening of the dollar. And on top of that, you basically have a central bank buying in bulk and that has not changed. That in turn basically means that the demand is there. And of course, gold supply is not coming up very strongly. So this deficit and demand and supply will likely actually keep gold prices very well supported over the medium term. So we do think that gold prices are likely to actually breach the $3,200 per ounce level. All right. Kelvin Tay, regional CIO at UBS Global Wealth Management, thanks so much for joining us. Let us take a look at how auto stocks are doing in Asia. We are waiting for this one and it’s panning out very much as we anticipated, seeing losses for all of those big names there to the tune of around 2 to 3%. Hyundai is an interesting one. That’s all 3.8%. This is despite yesterday celebrating the opening of a brand new $7.6 billion electric vehicle factory based in Georgia. Yes, that is the Georgia in the United States. So it appears even making hefty investments in the US, not enough to spare that stock from fear. Around that 25% tariff on autos announced today by President Trump, Heidi, does not seem so well. Coming up, I think the U.S. adviser tells us that Beijing is ready to deploy further stimulus if the economy needs it. Against the backdrop of the Trump tariff threat. We have that exclusive conversation next from the blog forum. This is Bloomberg. What we’re going to be doing is a 25% tariff on all cars that are not made in the United States. If they’re made in the United States, is absolutely not. We started off with a two and a half percent base, which is what we were at, and we go to 25%. All right. President Trump there talking about that 25% tariff on auto imports. Of course, that’s just the entree, the the main course yet to come on April the second. Our Australian government reporter, Ben Wiskus has been following this story for us. Ben, Australia has so far not been spared from the US by by the US, despite its position as an ally, is running a trade surplus. What more is coming down the pipe not just for Australia but for other Asian nations? Yeah, well, I mean, you mentioned just there about before the break about how high Andy’s stock prices fallen. And I mean, the reason behind that is because they are the second largest importer of cars, the US outside of Volkswagen in Europe. So obviously these tariffs are going to affect nations across Asia in a big way, including Australia. Both Japan and South Korea are huge importers of cars to the U.S. and most by their economy. And in addition, we’ve got Canada and Mexico over in North America as well. As far as Australia is concerned, looking towards that April two deadline yesterday, I asked Treasurer Jim Chalmers whether or not they’ve been given any assurances yet by President Trump that Australia would be part of the very limited exemptions from that liberalization de Trump tariff announcement. He said there has not. These are, they’ve been told so far nothing. So a no news show whether or not Australia will get a treasured exemption from those Liberation Day tariffs and an exemption might only come with a deal. We know that Trump loves that, and he said that with respect to potentially tick tock and some sort of exemption for China. Take a listen. I’m worried about our country more than anything else with respect to tick tock and that China is going to have to play a role in that, possibly in the form of an approval maybe. And I think they’ll do that. Maybe I’ll give them a little reduction in tariffs or something to get it done. Know, Ben, this seems like it would come down to the sale of TikTok to an American company. But I guess anything is possible in terms of what sways the president. Oh, absolutely. And this is something that Trump’s been talking about for quite some time. The goal to get tick tock sold to a U.S. company. I think there was a lot of relief inside talk initially at his win, given that there was very successfully convinced him of the value of tick tock to America. But it has turned into something of a double edged sword. Now that Trump believes it is so useful that he would like to see it in American hands. Now that looks like something that he could use his tariffs to potentially put a bit of pressure on tick tock to hand it over. But we’ll have to wait and see. I think for as far as Australia is concerned, Australia had previously tried to use critical minerals as a source of dealmaking, with the U.S. maybe promising a larger chunk of critical minerals for America if they gave Australia a tariff exemption. It didn’t convince Trump to not put a steel and aluminum tariff on Australia. So it remains to be seen whether or not those April two tariffs will be any different. Ben, we need to talk about signal. Of course, Pete Hegseth, including a journalist on that signal chat which discussed air strikes on Yemen. Australia is, of course, a member of the Five Eyes, a trusted longtime ally of the United States. Seems to have been a diplomatic silence out of Canberra so far. Have we heard anything at all? Yes. Yesterday Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said that he would not be using signals to be communicating confidential information with his colleagues and even made a joke about him checking his own signal, a chance to see whether or not there are any journalists on them. So a bit of light, a little bit of light hearted ribbing maybe from the deputy Prime Minister, who’s also the Defence Minister and has met with Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth. So far there has been no moves in Australia to limit intelligence sharing with the US and there was following the election of the Trump administration. Now, but there was some pushback following those steel and aluminum tariffs that came in just over a week or so ago. It’ll be interesting to see if there is more to tariffs during liberation day or more ructions between Australia and the US. If things like intelligence sharing could become more of a political issue. But obviously that’s all still up in the air at this stage. No. I did hear from Mark Carney saying that the five eyes need to sort of watch out for themselves in light of this rise that Australia Government reporter Ben Westcott there as we continue to see that fallout on the signal chat issue. An adviser to the Chinese central bank says the economy has gotten off to a good start this year, but authorities are prepared to deploy more stimulus if growth loses momentum. Slipping spoke exclusively with our chief North Asia correspondent Stephen Engle at the World Forum. The government has made it very clear that if there is a need both of the fiscal policy and the monetary policy can step up, that I think is a very clear. So basically it will be data driven. If the economy is strong, then perhaps we can just go with it. But if the economy shows signs of a softness, then both the fiscal and monetary policies still have enough The scope for further expansion. How would you assess it right now coming out of the National People’s Congress? There seem to be a lot of talking about green shoots of confidence, but the property market in the first couple of months was still quite weak, Consumer demand still quite weak, and they didn’t necessarily announce specifics on easing or further large, large fiscal outlays other than long term bonds and the like. Now, do you see right now the need for further easing? Well, I think that we need the policy to be ready if we need that. As I said, it’s a data driven decision. But what we saw was after the end of September last year, the policy is a turn around and the numbers pick it up. So the first quarter was a much better than the third quarter. If you look at the high frequency data for the first couple of months, I think we have actually had a reasonably good start. Obviously, we needed to prevent a repeat of what happened before. That is the second quarter and the third quarter we again. And on that, I think that the readiness of the fiscal and monetary policy to support the economy would be very useful. In the first Trump trade war we saw I don’t want to use the term weaponization of the yuan, but we did see the weakening of the yuan some 11% over two years. This time the PBOC has kept it very steady and stable. Is that sort of weakening the overall easing platform or what? BUFFET that is that they’re stable, should they weaken it further? Well, there are many different arguments. If you is if you weaken the currency, that might be useful in the short term for exports. But at the same time, as, you know, exchange rate also has a big impact on the capital flows. It has an impact on trade flows, but also on capital flows. I think for the policy makers you have to balance trying to weigh, which is more important if the currency is a weaker and hopefully if it gets lots of exports, then it’s a good. But it’s possible that you might not get a lot of exposure while you weaken the confidence of investors. So I think in my view is that the exchange rate is still managed the float, so management is still part of it. And at the end of the day, you need to balance the likely impact on different parts of the economy. What do you think the policy response so far to the external shocks? Has it been successful enough? We don’t know what’s coming. On April 2nd, there could be further tariffs. Is China going to be able to weather this external shock? Well, China will be able to weather the external shocks. The question is how big a will be the shock. But that’s also in line with the policy direction going forward. Exports are will be important to continuously to be important. The question is, can China continuously rely on exports to drive a Chinese growth? That’s why the priority actually now is more on expanding domestic demand, particularly domestic consumption. PRC advisor Wang Yi Ping, speaking exclusively with our chief North Asia correspondent, Stephen Engle. We have more ahead on the Asia trade. This is Bloomberg. Well, Bloomberg has learned that Openai is close to finalizing a $48 billion funding round led by SoftBank. The deal is set to value the company at $300 billion. Bloomberg Senior executive technology editor Tom Giles joins us now from San Francisco with the details. And we’ve been tracking these discussions for a few months. But, you know, if this is pulled off, is going to be the biggest VC funding round in history. That’s right. That’s right. We did know that this was in the works. What we’ve revealed today is more detail on timing. It’s it’s coming soon. They’re very close to finalizing this, these discussions. We’ve gotten some detail on who some of the investors are going to be. Aside from SoftBank, we’ve got Founders Fund, we’ve got Magnetar, Capital, Kota. So the other players that are going to be part of this mega funding round, which as you pointed out, Pitchbook has identified as the largest ever for a venture capital backed startup. It’s a monumental funding round, biggest ever. So we’ve got new details on who some of the players are going to be. Who are these people who are going to have a stake in this company that is just seeing some tremendous growth? Tom, can you tell us a little bit more about those names perhaps, and whether or not this represents a good investment because revenue seems to be tracking reasonably well at open air? Yeah, that’s right. So Altimeter Founders Fund, which of course closely associated with Peter Teal. We are we earlier today we broke news on their expectations around revenue that it’ll more than triple in 2025 to about 12.7 billion. That’s up from 3.7 billion in 2024. They’re looking at 29.4 billion in 2026. So this is a company that is continues to grow at a rapid pace. As you know, these these generative AI tools, Openai is charging its customers for them. So these are things that are helping you not just change the way we work, but change the way we code. In particular, they’re being used by a widening circle of customers, and they’re just they’re changing the way we live and work and search and obtain information. People are willing to pay for them. Now, it’s notable we do not have exactly what the where they are in terms of profitability or loss making. Remember that creating these limbs, maintaining these these systems, these platforms costs a lot of money. So we’ll we’re going to continue to try to do is get you, our readers and our and our viewers, information on what the losses are, what the where, where margins are, what kind of profitability or lack thereof there is. That’s a huge outstanding question at a time when the cost of building the data centers, investing in the infrastructure that is needed for these platforms is a massive outlay of capital. All right. Bloomberg senior executive technology editor Tom Giles there. Let’s get some more news in the air space now. Ted Cowan, analysts say Microsoft has canceled new data center projects in the US and Europe due to an oversupply of computers to power A.I.. They say the move reflects Microsoft’s earlier decision to pass up some new business from open air. In a statement, Microsoft says it remains well positioned to meet increasing customer demand. Early fathers released a new AI model in its Quinn series that says it can process audio and video on phones and laptops. The company says the model could build agents that can assist the visually impaired people, among other applications. It’s touting what it calls a particularly high performance in speech, understanding and generation. All right. Let’s take a look at how futures in Europe are opening. We have stocks futures currently in the red to the tune of about half of 1%. DAX, futures a little bit softer as well. It’s going to be interesting to see how European carmakers perform following that announcement from President Trump of 25% tariffs on all non-U.S. made autos. Take a look at currencies as well. We may see them a move in the wake of that tariff announcement as well. More ahead on the Asian trade. I would be wary of assuming that the impact of tariff increases on inflation will be entirely temporary, or that a look through strategy will necessarily be appropriate. I would be especially vigilant, vigilant about indirect second round effects on inflation. You know, there’s been four big trends in the last 35 years or so lower rates, deregulation, technology and the last globalization. Certainly globalization is being redefined right now. So Louis Fed President Alberto Musallam and Apollo Global Management President James Arthur. Take a look at how we’re tracking bonds at the moment. Given all of this sort of broader tariff uncertainty, as well as still questions, of course, over China’s economic recovery there as well. We did hear from the BBC one adviser saying that they stand ready to deploy if the economic growth momentum starts to slow. We are seeing bond markets showing really a rush of issuers at the point at this point before we see the impact of Trump tariffs hit on that April 2nd deadline next week. Paul. Yeah, we’ll be joined by Naveen Saigal BlackRock’s Asia-Pacific head of Fundamental fixed income. And David, thanks for joining us today. And I just want to pick up on that remark that we heard there from Alberto Musallam, really echoing what we heard from Rafael Bostic earlier this week, some warnings about the risks around tariffs versus inflation. How do you see these risk playing out? For having me on the show. And I certainly agree. You know, the word unprecedented has been used a lot in the last five years. And I think this is, again, an unprecedented time when it comes to policy uncertainty. There’s been a lot going around, and I actually posted it on my LinkedIn account of how the US trade policy uncertainty has hit, you know, multi-decade, basically all time highs. And this is a, you know, an interesting time because on one hand, the best way for investors to tackle uncertainty may be to hold cash. Nobody can blame you for putting your money into a four and a half percent money market account. But honestly, I think that is not the best opportunity for fixed income investors today. The best opportunity is that today you are able to earn about a six plus percent income stream through a diversified, fairly low risk portfolio of bonds. That is where we think investors should sit to ride out this policy uncertainty, not just from the US, but also even their developments in Europe around the German fiscal program going forward. China on the economic rebalancing. And you know, you can earn about a half a percent a month of income sitting on a portfolio of a 6% yield and wait to see how this plays out and deploy your cash. Then can you sketch out what that portfolio might look like? Because I know you consider Asian bonds to be a good diversifier. And these are interesting times. Certainly almost anywhere you look in fixed income these days, you can earn about a one and a half percent to 2% real yield. And we view real yield as basically the compensation you’re getting or the margin of safety you have for being wrong on inflation. There is a lot of inflation uncertainty as well, but with a 2% real yield, that’s a comfortable place to be. Now this opportunity set, as I said, so it’s to all sectors and it’s global. We think that the synchronization of economies with the epicenter being the Pacific Ocean, the economies on one on the left and the right, see the US and China have become very synchronized such that their growth, inflation and monetary policy trajectories have diverged. This started before COVID due to structural factors like immigration policy, demographics, geopolitics, trade policy. But it was accelerated through COVID because of the stopping and starting of the economies, the various fiscal policies that were used to counteract the effects of COVID. And now on the other side, what we have is a very uncorrelated bond market in Asia to that of the US, that correlation is almost zero. And so there are places in Asia that we like because they have that one and a half to 2% real yield, they actually have about a 6 to 7% nominal yield as well. And this fits very nicely into a global portfolio of bonds with that 6% income stream. What about the picture when it comes to opportunities in Japan, given the divergence in where that economy and that central bank is headed? Yeah, Japan is a it’s a truly unique one because in Japan I would say the kind of the monetary policy cycle, the fiscal cycle, those are again deep synchronised from the rest of the world. Certainly in monetary policy we can see that the BOJ has just embarked on this normalization path and we think that the normalization can continue. I mean, I was just talking to a Japanese colleague who was visiting last week and we were discussing how the four Japanese consumer, the Japanese man on the street, it feels pretty good to have a bump in your paycheck if a wage gain after a long time of flat wages, and then you get annoyed when you go into the grocery store or any store for that matter, and you see prices are higher than what they used to be or restaurant for that matter. But this is actually exactly how the wage price cycle works, right? You get a bump in wages and it flows into prices, price increases, and it flows back into higher wages. So I think the big will feel and we’ll see evidence that the path to normalization is there. Inflation is sustainable and cyclically sustainable. And so we do think that the market is being fairly fairly conservative in its pricing of the hiking path. So we don’t mind being short Japanese front end rates. At the same time, I will mention that Japan has one of the steeper Yukos amongst developed markets. So we’re actually occupying the long end of the Japanese yield curve because when you swap that back to dollars, especially when you swap that back to dollars, that does fall into this 6 to 7% yielding bucket that I mentioned. We’re seeing some moves on the longer end for China bonds after the I.M.F. tweak earlier this week. But I do wonder, given that both economic momentum is starting to pick up, but we’re also yet to see the full force of trade tariffs for China. Where do you see the opportunities for that market? I think in China this year, coming into this year, the whole market was basically long the the China fixed income complex. I think for China, when you see the market all on one side of a trade, the way to play that is to take the other side. So we have been playing Chinese routes from the short side. Now with this back up, I think there is more to we risk and it’s easier to to kind of play from the long side as well. But generally, I think to facilitate this rebalancing, we will need to see a generally easier path when it comes to monetary policy and financial conditions in China that that I think is the structural trend. And I think it’s a it’s a challenging time to rebalance the economy towards consumption. You need consumption to grow faster than the growth rate of the economy. And to facilitate that, it will require a policy shift. So we are also eagerly awaiting the developments that come out of China. And from the policy front, and again, I think when you have any uncertainty, the opportunity set to earn the six 7% income stream in global fixed income is a is an incredible one that we should not waste. In the vein. Before we let you go, we do have fourth quarter US GDP coming out, democracy holding steady, 2.3%. Do you have any recession concerns here? Not recession, no. We think that there will be a moderation, perhaps even a slowdown. And I’ll give you some numbers. You know, GDP going from 3%, which is kind of rough number is what it was last year to 1%. That is a haircut of about 2%. That is that could be painful and it could feel recessionary. But at the end of the day, at 1%, the economy is not actually contracting and that’s okay. 1% GDP, 3% inflation, 4% nominal growth rate. That’s okay for for most fixed income, for most credit spreads. On the other hand, in the 20 tens, if you had a 2% haircut to growth off of a one and a half percent to 2% growth rate, I mean, then you are at least flirting with recession, if not outright contracting. So I think that’s the difference. At the starting point, we’re starting from a pretty strong point. There will be some moderation, but I don’t think fixed income investors need to be very concerned. They’ve been really great to have you with us. Ivan Seigel, who is the BlackRock Asia Pacific head of fundamental fixed income there. We’re hearing now from Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba talking about reaction really when it comes to these Trump auto tariffs, that there are actions in response to US tariffs and they are possible actions reiterating that Japan is asking the U.S. for an auto tariff exemption and they’ll be considering the most effective response to these recently announced U.S. tariffs. And we have seen carmakers shares in Japan, as well as the rest of the region, slumping after President Trump slapped that 25% tariffs on all auto imports. Concerning for a lot of these markets, a lot of these automakers, I should say, that have key markets in America and sales now being sort of endangered, it’s pretty hard to see any upside when it comes to the broader Japanese markets, given that the most heavy waiting for stocks there, Toyota is down by half a percent. But we are off the session lows of as much as 4%. Honda getting more than half of its revenue from North America down there as well. Nissan also falling as well as Mazda, by far the worst performance when it comes to the topics index in Japan, like a number of traditional US allies have hoped for and sort of lobbied for trade tariff exemptions alongside the likes of Australia, of course, but have not to date received them. Well. Still ahead on the Asia trade, Chinese Electric Vehicle Maker Expo says its plans to ramp up global expansion as competition in the space accelerates. We’ll be hearing from the company’s president next. This is Bloomberg. Chinese TV maker Expunge says it’s planning to ramp up its global expansion as rival Bhiwadi charges ahead. Vice chairman and co-president Brian Goose spoke to us about their plans, including where they’re looking to invest in factories and other infrastructure. Our focus has been Europe, Southeast Asia and growing the Middle East as well. For us, I think, you know, the globalization is not just making cars available for these markets to sell. And we see actually it requires much stronger, you know, commitment and investment locally. That’s why we actually are building infrastructures. For example, we are now in process of building our R & D centers in Europe, in the German region. We are also looking at, as you mentioned, local production plants, for example. But we recently announced a plan to jointly look at the local production in Indonesia and also in terms of charging, we also are starting to think about local charging investments as well. So all of that I think, is required to really build a robust global business. We actually have already entered over 30 countries in the world and we have plans into dozens more. And I think it was local investment, local focus and local capabilities with the teams on the ground. I think that’ll give us a better chance of success. Are there any markets where you’re not yet producing cars, where you’re thinking that a localisation push might be worth? I mean, in other words, what is the next market that you’re potentially eyeing for that production, shifting production? As we look at long term, I think if you have an aspiration to be one of the leaders in core local markets, you have to be local. And that’s why I think of all the core markets. We think, you know, whether there is a need for localization, I think ultimately we need to do that. For example, in Southeast Asia, as mention Indonesia, maybe other countries as well. Maybe in Europe, there’s one of the large regions for these cells. Maybe local plans and infrastructure is also required. Even in Latin America, I feel that some of the large markets require local investments. I think all of that I think, is things that we are monitoring closely. And in Latin American markets where you see particular opportunities, obviously a really enormous market, while countries like Brazil and Mexico are very big. In fact, I see also very good reception to Chinese products locally. So I think those are definitely core markets we’re going to spend time in focusing on. Exponent Vice chairman and co-president Brian Gruber, speaking to Bloomberg’s Rebecca Chang Wilkins We are less than an hour away from the market open in China and this is big rally in tech stocks is on pause. Investors will be looking for more clarity on global economic policies, concrete signs of core business improvement to get things rolling again. Equities report from all joins us now. So we have seen significant profit taking on the Hang Seng tech space. Is that set to continue? I would say that maybe the profit taking might see a pause. I think the fact that the dragon index actually rose or it was slightly stronger than the other gauges in the US would probably give a little bit of more confidence to investors in this time zone. I think that still investors were a little bit harsh taking apart these tech companies earnings and scrutinizing for any just signs of negativity to take profit off the table. I think some of that risk off may persist in the coming sessions just ahead of all this terrible uncertainty. But even if so, I think that we have a pretty strong support line from the September lows through now that could provide a bit of a lift. So what else might be investors waiting for us? That early deep sea effect starts to wear off? Yeah, so the sentiment I’m getting is that the big question mark around all this cash that’s being thrown at these models is when will this start to bring money and when will this transform or translate into cash flows and paying users? I think that’s still one of the one of the key overhangs about this tech story. Another issue is the fact that, you know, on the macro level, China’s consumption still isn’t back completely to those like go go years. So that’s also going to cloud the outlook a little bit. But yeah, I think overall it’s just like, where is this A.I. push going to start to show up in earnings? But on the plus side, China’s always been known to be a have quite an edge in terms of application of technology as opposed to the like the organic, like development of the technology. So I think that in the coming months, I’m pretty optimistic about the fact that we’ll be seeing more applications both in software and in hardware. So that might be the next catalyst coming forward. Yeah. Do we see investors viewing H-shares versus A-shares through different prisms? Yeah, I think the view is still pretty divided. I mean, the tech play on a year has been really crowded in the smaller stocks, say the CSI 2000 index. So those are stocks that are not just not going to have somebody not just going to have the earnings support that the bigger HS tech peers are going to see because they have other businesses that they can rely on. But but that said, I think that a lot of the global investors are also eyeing a-shares with with more intensity because simply the fact that it shares have gone up so much while many of the a-shares have stayed mostly in place. Yeah. All right. Equities reporter April Mather. Well, Apple CEO Tim Cook has visited China’s artificial intelligence hub, Hangzhou, and the home of A.I. sensation Deep Sea, also tech giants Alibaba. Let’s get to our China correspondent in low for more and tell us about the significance of this visit. Yes. So Tim Cook made a visit to Hangzhou where he visited the Georgetown University and hailed what he called the next generation of developers, because this is a university that has churned out alumni like the Deep Sea founder Liang Win Fung and PD founder Colin Huang. And Apple has donated about ¥30 billion or $4 million to the university in partnership to support this mobile app innovation competition and to provide technical and business training for students. So in a way, it is a bid by Apple to show its continued commitment to this very important market where it has seen shipments of iPhones in the last quarter down about 25%, and that this intense competition from the likes of Seattle, me and Huawei and Tim Cook has been in China since early this week. He was in Beijing for the China Development Forum, where he got a chance to sit down with the Chinese Commerce Minister, Wang Wen Tao. And Wang had a signal that China is willing to welcome more investments from Apple for Apple to continue to deeply integrate into the Chinese economy. Wang also signaled that that equipment upgrading program, the subsidies, will cover foreign products like Apple’s iPhone. So in a way, it is a mutual form of engagement from Beijing side to woo these foreign investors and companies to stay in China. And also for Apple’s Tim Cook to show that they are here for, you know, with a stake in the country and they are here to stay for the long term despite that uncertainties globally. Meanwhile, Ali Baba has a new motto of its own. This phone can process text, pictures, audio and video. Yes, this is the latest iteration of Alibaba’s AI model, and it has been unveiling these new developments at record speed this year. Alibaba saying that this new model will be able to help build an agent that could help the visually impaired to navigate their environment with these real time audio descriptions, because this model has very strong capabilities in speech, speech, understanding and speech generation. And again, Alibaba has committed to investing $50 billion over the next three years in infrastructure. But as what April was said earlier, the company is also intent on partnering with companies for real world applications that could bring in that cash flow and that their latest deal is with BMW to help create that AI cockpit, a personal assistant in these cars that are being built and produced in China that will roll out next year. The personal assistant in these cars will help you to plan trips and to offer parking and nearby restaurant recommendations. And it is also a win win for BMW, which has been seeing dwindling market share. It’s a sales was down about 13% last year. Again, this intense competition from local rivals because this is a market where software increasingly is that important differentiator in the EV space. And BMW is joining a number of foreign companies like BMW and Volkswagen as well to seek these tech partnerships, to get the tech expertise to stay ahead of that race. Glenn Beck’s China correspondent Menlow there, Moorhead, to stay with us. This is Bloomberg. And take a look at some of the top global headlines that we’re tracking this hour. And Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney says U.S. tariffs on autos are a direct attack on Canadian workers and his government will soon respond. He also says Trump’s action is a violation of Canada’s trade agreement with the US and Mexico. Carney will convene a cabinet meeting on Thursday focused on trade, while also suggesting Trump should speak with him about the actions he’s taken. The High Court has cleared South Korean opposition leader Lily James of breaking election laws. The ruling overturns a lower court’s decision which found Lee guilty of making false claims in 2021 while campaigning for the presidency. The acquittal could boost Lee’s chances in any election triggered if president use of killers impeachment is upheld by the constitutional court. Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro will stand trial on allegations that he attempted a coup following his 2022 election defeat. A Supreme Court panel unanimously voted to accept criminal charges against him. Bolsonaro has denied wrongdoing and accuses the Supreme Court of holding a personal grudge against him. All right. Time to check some of the stocks to watch when markets open in Hong Kong and mainland China. Alibaba, Baidu, Tencent, JD.com, some of these names could see some upsides. We have, of course, just told you the story about Tim Cook paying that visit to Gwangju as well as seen I related names coming under a little bit of pressure. In the US, however, some concerns over datacentre capacity and whether or not there are signs of frothiness on air stocks as well. Let’s take a look at how US futures and China futures are shaping up as a bit of a rough session for US stocks. We’ve got S & P futures currently to the downside by about a 10th of 1%. A little bit of softness for Taiwan and Chinese futures as well, although we did have a suggestion from President Trump that there could be some sort of deal for China on lower tariffs if there was support for a tick tock sale or that is it from the Asia trade markets. Coverage continues as we look ahead to the start of trading in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Shenzhen. Try to show up next. This is going back.